22 Comments
User's avatar
California Curated's avatar

Excellent post. Fascinating and well researched. Well written, per usual. Thanks for the mention!

Expand full comment
Amanda Royal's avatar

Thank you! Your article spurred me to think about the issue a bit more.

Expand full comment
James Freitas's avatar

Your hopeful headlines are such a heartening reminder of the fact that not all environmental news stories have to be deflating.

Expand full comment
Amanda Royal's avatar

Thank you, James! That's exactly why I'm doing this. Most of the headlines make people turn away. Hope you're doing well.

Expand full comment
Aida Brunell's avatar

Bravo ! Your article is full of valuable Information.

Expand full comment
Amanda Royal's avatar

Thanks!🙏

Expand full comment
Rob Moir's avatar

"Oysters are nearly the best at releasing the least amount of carbon to build proteins. The most efficient seafood with the smallest carbon footprint was found to be rope-grown farmed mussels, at an astounding 0.2 pounds of carbon dioxide used to produce one pound of protein.

Dr. Frances Sandison, Life Cycle Analyst at the James Hutton Institute in Aberdeen, completed a Ph.D. assessing what role Shetland seafood consumption can play in delivering smaller carbon footprints. Farmed salmon were found to be the worst, at four pounds of carbon dioxide per pound of protein, because most salmon are fed. Modern pelagic mid-water trawl fleets catching mackerel and herring were assessed at 0.3 to 0.7 pounds with an average of 0.5 pounds per pound of protein.

Expand full comment
Amanda Royal's avatar

Your comment makes me hungry for seafood🦀

If we eat it, is the carbon still sequestered?

Expand full comment
Rob Moir's avatar

Like a forest, only shorter time.

Expand full comment
Emese-Réka Fromm's avatar

Thanks for all the good news! So needed!

Expand full comment
Jack's avatar

Love the newsletter, great content as always, however I am disappointed that as a climate newsletter you're using AI generated imagery, it seems somewhat antithetical to your message.

Expand full comment
Amanda Royal's avatar

Thanks for the feedback.👍The Substack editor has an out-of-the box AI image generator. I don’t use it often, but when I do, I try to be transparent about it.

Expand full comment
Jack's avatar

Thanks for the reply, I do very much appreciate that you labelled it as such rather than trying to sneak it under the radar like so many places do!

Expand full comment
Richard Blaisdell's avatar

One day I'd like to read a story on dirt. That is soil. It is not dead. But chemicals sod to consumers,, many kill earthworms, and other critters that digest organic matter to provide nutrients in return. I wrote about dirt in my book. I hope you will scan the pages. "One Green Thumb and Nine Sticky fingers." It's a good read. Many photos. Part of my life. Enjoy your every post.

Expand full comment
Amanda Royal's avatar

Love this idea! Yes, lots going on with soil. Thank you for being a loyal reader and commenter, Richard. 🙏

Expand full comment
William Kern's avatar

May a force of nanosponges be with us - filtering things that would kill us to filter ourselves - always … although it does present a moral hazard.

Expand full comment
Amanda Royal's avatar

The images this comment conjures ...

Expand full comment
Julie Snider's avatar

What a wealth of good enviro news!! Thanks for keeping us informed and inspired, Amanda.

Expand full comment
Amanda Royal's avatar

Thanks 😊

Expand full comment
Richard Blaisdell's avatar

Got to love the nano sponges to clean up toxins. Believe zeolites work the same way.

Expand full comment
Amanda Royal's avatar

Thank you. I'd never heard of zeolites 👍

Expand full comment
Richard Blaisdell's avatar

you I would think be inquisitive and look up the word.

Any of a large group of minerals consisting of hydrated aluminosilicates of sodium, potassium, calcium, and barium. They can be readily dehydrated and rehydrated, and are used as cation exchangers and molecular sieves.

Expand full comment